If it is another individual's analysis of an artist's intent behind the work, I very rarely read it. Especially if they seem to begin to wade into the pseudo-intellectual end of the pool. I do like hearing an artist's background because it does give you some clues as to where the work is coming from. If the artist wants to tell me their thought process behind the piece, I prefer that to a full-on explanation of symbolism or message. Little clues are great. Ultimately, once a piece is out in the world, for better or worse it takes on new meaning for each viewer based on their experiences and perspectives.
Well said! I think there's a part of me that defers to the institution of the museum or gallery as experts. Surely they know more than I do. But shitty writing is shitty writing.
If it is another individual's analysis of an artist's intent behind the work, I very rarely read it. Especially if they seem to begin to wade into the pseudo-intellectual end of the pool. I do like hearing an artist's background because it does give you some clues as to where the work is coming from. If the artist wants to tell me their thought process behind the piece, I prefer that to a full-on explanation of symbolism or message. Little clues are great. Ultimately, once a piece is out in the world, for better or worse it takes on new meaning for each viewer based on their experiences and perspectives.
Well said! I think there's a part of me that defers to the institution of the museum or gallery as experts. Surely they know more than I do. But shitty writing is shitty writing.